בשל הגנת זכויות יוצרים מובא להלן תקציר המאמר. ניתן לקרוא את הטקסט המלא בקישור בהתאם לספרייה הרפואית הזמינה לך  

Ben-Horin S, Salomon N, Karampekos G, Viazis N, Lahat A, Ungar B, Eliakim R, Kuperstein R, Kriger-Sharabi O, Reiss-Mintz H, Yanai H, Dotan I, Zittan E, Maharshak N, Hirsch A, Weitman M, Mantzaris GJ, Kopylov U. Curcumin-QingDai Combination for Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):347-356.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 Jun 9. PMID: 37302449.

Abstract

Background & aims: We evaluated the efficacy of herbal combination of curcumin-QingDai (CurQD) in active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: Part I was an open-label trial of CurQD in patients with active UC, defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score of 5 or higher and a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or higher. Part II was a placebo-controlled trial conducted in Israel and Greece, randomizing active UC patients at a 2:1 ratio to enteric-coated CurQD 3 g/d or placebo for 8 weeks. The co-primary outcome was clinical response (reduction in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index of ≥3 points) and an objective response (Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of ≥1 or a 50% fecal calprotectin reduction). Responding patients continued either maintenance curcumin or placebo alone for an additional 8 weeks. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor activation was assessed by cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) mucosal expression.

Results: In part I, 7 of 10 patients responded and 3 of 10 achieved clinical remission. Of 42 patients in part II, the week 8 co-primary outcome was achieved in 43% and 8% of CurQD and placebo patients, respectively (P = .033). Clinical response was observed in 85.7% vs 30.7% (P < .001), clinical remission in 14 of 28 (50%) vs 1 of 13 (8%; P = .01), a 50% calprotectin reduction in 46.4% vs 15.4% (P = .08), and endoscopic improvement in 75% vs 20% (P = .036) in the CurQD and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse events were comparable between groups. By week 16, curcumin-maintained clinical response, clinical remission, and clinical biomarker response rates were 93%, 80%, and 40%, respectively. CurQD uniquely up-regulated mucosal CYP1A1 expression, which was not observed among patients receiving placebo, mesalamine, or biologics.

Conclusions: In this placebo-controlled trial, CurQD was effective for inducing response and remission in active UC patients. The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway may merit further study as a potential UC treatment target.